Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 800 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 120/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 22.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.5 µg/L | 117/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 59.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 105 µg/L | 117/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 91.8 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 117 µg/L | 117/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 16.875 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.9 µg/L | 116/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 19.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55 µg/L | 107/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 95/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 81/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 78/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 4300 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5400 µg/L | 54/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 43.85 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 43/43 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 36/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 159.3 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 167 µg/L | 15/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.55 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 10/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 15.1 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 10/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 9/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 200000 µg/L 2000% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L | 9/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 3 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 7/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 7.185 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 2/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromate | 8.4 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 10 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about San Luis Obispo Water Department
Is San Luis Obispo Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in San Luis Obispo Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in San Luis Obispo Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does San Luis Obispo Water Department serve?
San Luis Obispo Water Department reports serving 47,788 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has San Luis Obispo Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2 violations on file for San Luis Obispo Water Department, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.