Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

132 Investments Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 39 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

39
contaminants tested
5
detected
252
people served
8
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
San Joaquin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
18
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-03-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-03-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-12-01 → 2010-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-12-01 → 2010-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2400 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0047 mg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2025
Arsenic
4.4 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
7.8 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
830 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
34 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideLeadMercuryNitriteStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LLC, 132 INVESTMENTS
Phone
209-640-5733
Email
132investments@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about 132 Investments Water

Is 132 Investments Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in 132 Investments Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in 132 Investments Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Arsenic, Selenium, Nitrate-Nitrite. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does 132 Investments Water serve?

132 Investments Water reports serving 252 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has 132 Investments Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 18 violations on file for 132 Investments Water, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.