Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-01-01 → 2000-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-01-01 → 2000-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 11074 µg/L 111% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10000 µg/L | 5736/6750 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 120 µg/L 150% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 261/277 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 70 µg/L No EPA limit set | 202/281 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 30 µg/L No EPA limit set | 192/281 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 39 µg/L No EPA limit set | 179/272 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 91 µg/L 152% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 178/272 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 43 µg/L No EPA limit set | 175/272 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 51 µg/L No EPA limit set | 152/281 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1700 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 82/85 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 25 µg/L No EPA limit set | 77/281 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set | 68/272 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 68/272 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 43.21 µg/L 144% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 30 µg/L | 58/64 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1000000 µg/L 10000% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10000 µg/L | 48/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0029 mg/L 19% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 32/32 | LCR | 2023 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 13.3 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 20/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 19/272 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE | 0.0250 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L | 13/153 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 6.3 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 4/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.0820 pCi/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lithium | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/38 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Chromium | 14 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 2/89 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloromethane | 0.6100 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 2/104 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Styrene | 1 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 2/104 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.4 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Redlands City Mud-Water Div
Is Redlands City Mud-Water Div tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Redlands City Mud-Water Div's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Redlands City Mud-Water Div's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Redlands City Mud-Water Div serve?
Redlands City Mud-Water Div reports serving 78,025 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Redlands City Mud-Water Div had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Redlands City Mud-Water Div, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.