Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Princes Camp Resort Ws

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 60 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

60
contaminants tested
5
detected
126
people served
38
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Monterey

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

38
health-based violations
61
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-11-01 → 2008-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-11-01 → 2008-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-11-01 → 2008-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-11-01 → 2008-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
2705 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3100 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
226 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 12/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 4/4 LCR 2023
Barium
51 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Nitrate-Nitrite
100000 µg/L 1000%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GRIFFIN, SEAN
Phone
831-262-1955
Email
SEAN@AGENCYONEREALESTATE.COM

Frequently asked questions about Princes Camp Resort Ws

Is Princes Camp Resort Ws tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Princes Camp Resort Ws's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Princes Camp Resort Ws's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Nitrate-Nitrite. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Princes Camp Resort Ws serve?

Princes Camp Resort Ws reports serving 126 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Princes Camp Resort Ws had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 61 violations on file for Princes Camp Resort Ws, of which 38 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.