← California

Tap water quality report

Rolling Hills Rancho Wa

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 49 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

49
contaminants tested
5
detected
185
people served
44
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Monterey

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

44
health-based violations
92
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9400 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
52/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
304 µg/L 7.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2016
Lead
0.00090 mg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 2025
Chromium
11 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2016
Lead
26 µg/L 173%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2016
44 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneLassoMercuryNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CRAWFORD, SEAN
Phone
831-325-3401
Email
blfd124@yahoo.com

Frequently asked questions about Rolling Hills Rancho Wa

Is Rolling Hills Rancho Wa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Rolling Hills Rancho Wa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rolling Hills Rancho Wa's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Fluoride, Lead, Chromium, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rolling Hills Rancho Wa serve?

Rolling Hills Rancho Wa reports serving 185 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Rolling Hills Rancho Wa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 92 violations on file for Rolling Hills Rancho Wa, of which 44 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.