Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 54.8 µg/L 548% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 690 µg/L | 226/226 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 11220.9 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11526 µg/L | 30/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 196 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 9/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 120 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.0016 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 4/4 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Bromoform | 9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| TTHM | 18.8 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 3.9 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Chromium | 13.69 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.8565 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
64 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Prunedale Mwc
Is Prunedale Mwc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Prunedale Mwc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Prunedale Mwc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Fluoride, Barium, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Prunedale Mwc serve?
Prunedale Mwc reports serving 277 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Prunedale Mwc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 93 violations on file for Prunedale Mwc, of which 40 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.