Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

The Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 39 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

39
contaminants tested
5
detected
40
people served
3
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Madera

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1400 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
 6/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
170 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2023
Nitrate
474.6 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
75 µg/L 500%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
 1/9 SYR4 2013–2019
34 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneMercuryNitrate-NitriteNitriteSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MONTHEI, DUSTIN
Phone
559-412-5590
Email
dmonthei@chukchansi-nsn.gov

Frequently asked questions about The Village

Is The Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in The Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in The Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Nitrate, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does The Village serve?

The Village reports serving 40 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has The Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for The Village, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.