Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-11-01 → 2017-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-11-01 → 2017-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-06-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-06-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-05-01 → 2017-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-05-01 → 2017-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-12-01 → 2016-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-12-01 → 2016-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 12 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 163/163 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 3400 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5100 µg/L | 42/68 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 30.0235 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.76 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 6.25 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.748 pCi/L 35% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.89 pCi/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Copper | 10.77 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 319 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 3/3 | LCR | 2023 |
| Mercury | 0.8460 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8700 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 3.13 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Bromoform | 5.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Chloroform | 0.7200 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 220000 µg/L 2200% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Selenium | 1.3 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 16 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.7 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
35 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts
Is Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts's water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Combined Uranium, Barium, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts serve?
Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts reports serving 300 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 154 violations on file for Md 46 Ahwahnee Resorts, of which 92 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.