Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-11-01 → 2008-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-11-01 → 2008-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-11-01 → 2008-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-02-01 → 1993-03-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-02-01 → 1993-03-01 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 25 µg/L No EPA limit set | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 32 µg/L No EPA limit set | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 24 µg/L No EPA limit set | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16 µg/L No EPA limit set | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 77 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 120/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 118/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 117/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Foothill Municipal Water Dist.
Is Foothill Municipal Water Dist. tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Foothill Municipal Water Dist.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Foothill Municipal Water Dist.'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Foothill Municipal Water Dist. serve?
Foothill Municipal Water Dist. reports serving 0 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Foothill Municipal Water Dist. had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Foothill Municipal Water Dist., of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.