Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-12-21 → 2000-07-13 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-12-21 → 2000-07-13 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-12-21 → 2000-07-13 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-12-21 → 2000-07-13 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 7300 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 248/248 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | 3.6 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 7 µg/L | 130/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 16 µg/L 320% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 5 µg/L | 130/131 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 4.5 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 130/131 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 29/29 | LCR | 2025 |
| TTHM | 16 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 12/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.3 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 190 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 560 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.5 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 3/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 11 µg/L 183% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 6 µg/L | 2/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 5.96 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Dichloromethane | 2.4 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 6200 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Pentachlorophenol | 0.8100 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 1 µg/L | 1/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene | 0.8000 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Industry Waterworks Systems
Is City of Industry Waterworks Systems tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City of Industry Waterworks Systems's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Industry Waterworks Systems's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, Tetrachloroethylene, Trichloroethylene, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Industry Waterworks Systems serve?
City of Industry Waterworks Systems reports serving 6,158 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has City of Industry Waterworks Systems had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for City of Industry Waterworks Systems, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.