← California

Tap water quality report

White Fence Farms Mwc no.3

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
749
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Los Angeles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
48
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0059 mg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
37/37 LCR 2024
Bromodichloromethane
19.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
41.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
91.9 µg/L 115%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
22.2 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
29.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
16.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
10.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
27/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
17.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
25/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
11.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/31 SYR4 2012–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
CopperLeadMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MOORE, BRANDI
Phone
661-943-6916
Email
WHITEFENCEFARMS3@GMAIL.COM

Frequently asked questions about White Fence Farms Mwc no.3

Is White Fence Farms Mwc no.3 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in White Fence Farms Mwc no.3's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in White Fence Farms Mwc no.3's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does White Fence Farms Mwc no.3 serve?

White Fence Farms Mwc no.3 reports serving 749 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has White Fence Farms Mwc no.3 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 48 violations on file for White Fence Farms Mwc no.3, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.