← California

Tap water quality report

Cws - Lakeland

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 63 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

63
contaminants tested
24
detected
294
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Kern

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-07-01 → 2002-10-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-07-01 → 2002-10-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-07-01 → 2002-10-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-07-01 → 2002-10-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 2000-03-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
19174.5 µg/L 192%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22544.9 µg/L
386/408 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
6370.4 µg/L 159%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 28000 µg/L
333/346 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
20.0755 µg/L 201%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.653 µg/L
126/194 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
33.2464 µg/L 111%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.2321 µg/L
120/189 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
19.6963 µg/L 328%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.222 µg/L
116/185 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00048 mg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
37/37 LCR 2024
Copper
68.1735 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 460 µg/L
30/179 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
9.2281 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
30/160 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
30.481 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.2 µg/L
26/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Beryllium, Total
0.1149 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1450 µg/L
24/99 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.5228 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
22/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
0.4090 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8420 µg/L
21/109 SYR4 2012–2019
Cadmium
0.0524 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0540 µg/L
17/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
5.296 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.38 µg/L
9/12 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
9.624 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L
9/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.83 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.21 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.576 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.72 µg/L
5/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
18880 µg/L 189%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22000 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
9.02 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
5/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Thallium, Total
0.0116 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0120 µg/L
3/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
3/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Toluene
1 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2013–2019
39 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JAMES, SOPHIE
Phone
408-367-8593
Email
sjames@calwater.com

Frequently asked questions about Cws - Lakeland

Is Cws - Lakeland tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Cws - Lakeland's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cws - Lakeland's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Fluoride, Arsenic, Combined Uranium, Antimony, Total, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cws - Lakeland serve?

Cws - Lakeland reports serving 294 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Cws - Lakeland had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Cws - Lakeland, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.