← California

Tap water quality report

Rosamond Csd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
10
detected
17,711
people served
23
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kern

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

23
health-based violations
23
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
36 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
86/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
21.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
84/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
61/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
27/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
26/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.2 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
26/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2024
Chloroform
15.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
21/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
46.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/6 UCMR-5 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/108 SYR4 2012–2019
34 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaCopperHfpo-DaLeadMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
DOMINGO, KIM
Phone
661-256-5708
Email
kdomingo@rosamondcsd.com

Frequently asked questions about Rosamond Csd

Is Rosamond Csd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Rosamond Csd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rosamond Csd's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rosamond Csd serve?

Rosamond Csd reports serving 17,711 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Rosamond Csd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 23 violations on file for Rosamond Csd, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.