← California

Tap water quality report

Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 45 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

45
contaminants tested
7
detected
150
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Kern

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
21
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-02-01 → 2015-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-02-01 → 2015-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-12-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-12-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9130 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9492 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00090 mg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2023
Barium
136 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
798 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
2.19 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
2.1 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
8100 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
38 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateEthylbenzeneLassoMercuryNitriteSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RENNEGARBE, PHILLIP
Phone
760-384-8791
Email
PHILTHYTOO@HOTMAIL.COM

Frequently asked questions about Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company

Is Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Fluoride, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company serve?

Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company reports serving 150 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 21 violations on file for Sierra Breeze Mutual Water Company, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.