Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Addressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-05-01 → 2018-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-05-01 → 2018-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 45 µg/L No EPA limit set | 101/103 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 55.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 101/103 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 35 µg/L No EPA limit set | 101/103 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 140 µg/L 175% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 101/103 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 41.6 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 99/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 98/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 32.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 94/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 93/103 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 85/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 19/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lithium | 61 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Barium | 130 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Fluoride | 380 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Nitrate | 410 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.6 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.08 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 420 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Imperial, City of
Is Imperial, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Imperial, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Imperial, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Imperial, City of serve?
Imperial, City of reports serving 21,591 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Imperial, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 36 violations on file for Imperial, City of, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.