← California

Tap water quality report

Iid Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 39 contaminants and detected 4. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

39
contaminants tested
4
detected
37
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Imperial

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1999-04-01 → 1999-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 2000-03-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
11 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2018–2019
Lead
0.0023 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 2024
Barium
23 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2018
Fluoride
570 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2018
35 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneMercuryNitrateSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
QUINN, VICTORIA HARLEY
Phone
760-482-3615
Email
vhquinn@iid.com

Frequently asked questions about Iid Village

Is Iid Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 4 contaminants in Iid Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Iid Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Lead, Barium, Fluoride. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Iid Village serve?

Iid Village reports serving 37 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Iid Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Iid Village, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.