Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-05-01 → 2019-05-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-05-01 → 2019-05-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-05-01 → 2019-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 2000-03-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1600 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L | 44/330 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 249 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 510 µg/L | 19/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 793500 µg/L 7935% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810000 µg/L | 12/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 6.88 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 9/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 168 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L | 5/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.29555 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.49 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 16 µg/L 267% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 6 µg/L | 1/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 120 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 28 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| TTHM | 35 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.8600 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 45 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
33 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Resort Improvement District #1
Is Resort Improvement District #1 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Resort Improvement District #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Resort Improvement District #1's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Resort Improvement District #1 serve?
Resort Improvement District #1 reports serving 803 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Resort Improvement District #1 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for Resort Improvement District #1, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.