Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Fcsa 49 - Five Points

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 56 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

56
contaminants tested
19
detected
440
people served
79
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fresno

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

79
health-based violations
89
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
228.5 µg/L 286%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L
24/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
82.35 µg/L 137%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
76.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
59.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 72 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
22.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
76.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
32.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
31.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
55.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
20/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 17/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
45 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.39 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1717.6 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 6/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.58 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 5/5 LCR 2023
Selenium
1.2 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
5.845 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
100 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
37 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateEndothallEthylbenzeneLassoLeadMercuryNitriteSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BUMP, CHRIS
Phone
559-600-4482
Email
cbump@fresnocountyca.gov

Frequently asked questions about Fcsa 49 - Five Points

Is Fcsa 49 - Five Points tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Fcsa 49 - Five Points's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fcsa 49 - Five Points's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fcsa 49 - Five Points serve?

Fcsa 49 - Five Points reports serving 440 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Fcsa 49 - Five Points had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 89 violations on file for Fcsa 49 - Five Points, of which 79 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.