Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 91.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 110 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 108.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 73.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 80 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 53.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 260 µg/L 325% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 138.5 µg/L 231% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 56.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 21.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 23/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 30.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 22/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 15.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 19/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0016 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2023 |
| Barium | 41.95 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.47 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.7 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 994.4 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.39 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 37.6 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
38 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek
Is Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek serve?
Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek reports serving 462 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 238 violations on file for Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek, of which 185 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.