← California

Tap water quality report

Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 56 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

56
contaminants tested
18
detected
462
people served
185
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fresno

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

185
health-based violations
238
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
91.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
108.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
73.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 80 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
53.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
260 µg/L 325%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
138.5 µg/L 231%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
56.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
21.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
30.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
22/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
15.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
19/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2023
Barium
41.95 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.47 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
1.7 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
994.4 µg/L 9.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
1.39 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
37.6 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
38 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateEndothallEthylbenzeneFluorideLassoLeadMercuryNitriteSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BUMP, CHRIS
Phone
559-600-4482
Email
cbump@fresnocountyca.gov

Frequently asked questions about Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek

Is Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek serve?

Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek reports serving 462 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 238 violations on file for Fcsa 32 - Cantua Creek, of which 185 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.