← California

Tap water quality report

Woodward Bluffs Mhp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 53 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

53
contaminants tested
3
detected
300
people served
15
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Fresno

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
47
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-07-01 → 2012-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-07-01 → 2012-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-05-01 → 2009-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2025
Arsenic
3.63 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
159 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
50 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneLassoLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SOUTH, JENNIFER
Phone
559-476-1431
Email
jsouth@west-co.com

Frequently asked questions about Woodward Bluffs Mhp

Is Woodward Bluffs Mhp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Woodward Bluffs Mhp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodward Bluffs Mhp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Arsenic, Fluoride. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodward Bluffs Mhp serve?

Woodward Bluffs Mhp reports serving 300 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Woodward Bluffs Mhp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 47 violations on file for Woodward Bluffs Mhp, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.