← California

Tap water quality report

Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 40 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

40
contaminants tested
6
detected
185
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fresno

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
37
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
1665 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2024
Arsenic
4.735 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
104.555 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
1.9 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
34 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneLassoLeadMercuryNitriteSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BUMP, CHRIS
Phone
559-600-4482
Email
cbump@fresnocountyca.gov

Frequently asked questions about Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour

Is Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour serve?

Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour reports serving 185 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 37 violations on file for Fcwwd 38/sky Harbour, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.