Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 92.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 120 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 142.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 80.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 69.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 170 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 260 µg/L 325% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 177 µg/L 295% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 53.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 20.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 23/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 14.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 21/23 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 34.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42 µg/L | 20/24 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0130 mg/L 87% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2023 |
| Barium | 41 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.54 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 62.595 µg/L 4.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 72 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 6.54 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 994.4 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.92 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
38 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir
Is Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir serve?
Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir reports serving 241 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 198 violations on file for Fcsa 30 - El Porvenir, of which 169 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.