← California

Tap water quality report

Awa Buckhorn Plant

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 81 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

81
contaminants tested
8
detected
8,791
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Amador

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
11
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 2000-04-04
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dichloroacetic Acid
32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
46/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
83 µg/L 138%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
46/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
150 µg/L
No EPA limit set
45/45 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
45/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
44/45 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
150 µg/L 188%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
44/45 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/46 SYR4 2013–2019
73 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneFluorideHfpo-DaLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FERRIERA, RICK
Phone
209-257-5284
Email
rferriera@amadorwater.gov

Frequently asked questions about Awa Buckhorn Plant

Is Awa Buckhorn Plant tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Awa Buckhorn Plant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Awa Buckhorn Plant's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Awa Buckhorn Plant serve?

Awa Buckhorn Plant reports serving 8,791 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Awa Buckhorn Plant had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 11 violations on file for Awa Buckhorn Plant, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.