Tap WaterIndex

← Arizona

Tap water quality report

Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 112 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

112
contaminants tested
17
detected
1,071
people served
99
health-based violations
Arizona rankingsLead in ArizonaPFAS in Arizona
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Pinal

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

99
health-based violations
337
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-09
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-09

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
13570 µg/L 136%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14000 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
218 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1660 µg/L
93/146 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
13455 µg/L 135%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 13800 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
16.48 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.2 µg/L
19/146 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 18/18 LCR 2025
TTHM
13.88 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
3074 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3230 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10.8 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
9/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.095 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.095 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
Lithium
185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
7 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Barium
49 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Chromium
6.5 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
17.3 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
95 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
OWENSBY, KIM
Phone
520-421-8625
Email
kim_owensby@cgaz.gov

Frequently asked questions about Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd

Is Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd serve?

Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd reports serving 1,071 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.

Has Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 337 violations on file for Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd, of which 99 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.