← Arkansas

Tap water quality report

Hartman Waterworks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
13
detected
947
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Johnson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
23
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-03-01 → 2018-03-31
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2018-03-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-03-01 → 2018-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-11-01 → 2017-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-11-01 → 2017-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-11-01 → 2017-11-30
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2016-06-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
15.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
48.6 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
22.1 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
19/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
50 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
13/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2004
Dibromoacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
4/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/20 SYR4 2012–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
WEATHERS, JACKIE
Phone
479-214-3731
Email
hwater@cswnet.com

Frequently asked questions about Hartman Waterworks

Is Hartman Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Hartman Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hartman Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hartman Waterworks serve?

Hartman Waterworks reports serving 947 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Hartman Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 23 violations on file for Hartman Waterworks, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.