Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-03-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-03-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 408.55 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 507 µg/L | 22/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 12.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.31 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.207 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.17 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 8.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.865 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 38.375 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.7 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.265 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2003 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 120 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 260 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 1 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.74 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.8 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| P-Dichlorobenzene | 3.92 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 75 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Tuckerman Waterworks
Is Tuckerman Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Tuckerman Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Tuckerman Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Tuckerman Waterworks serve?
Tuckerman Waterworks reports serving 1,817 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.
Has Tuckerman Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 50 violations on file for Tuckerman Waterworks, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.