← Arkansas

Tap water quality report

Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
3,071
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Crawford

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
62
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
8.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
59.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
65.8 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
21.4 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2003
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
12 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
4/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
7.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
22.6 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/40 SYR4 2012–2019

Utility contact

Contact
CONCORDWATERAND SEWER

Frequently asked questions about Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co

Is Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co serve?

Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co reports serving 3,071 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 62 violations on file for Concord Water & Sewer Pfb of Crawford Co, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.