← Alabama

Tap water quality report

New Hope Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 35 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

35
contaminants tested
5
detected
6,231
people served
10
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Madison

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0053 µg/L 1/3 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
60 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
44.9 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
123 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaLeadNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
WALLING, ROGER
Phone
256-723-2616
Email
mayor@newhopeal.gov

Frequently asked questions about New Hope Water

Is New Hope Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in New Hope Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Hope Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Pfba. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Hope Water serve?

New Hope Water reports serving 6,231 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has New Hope Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for New Hope Water, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.