Tap WaterIndex

← Alaska

Tap water quality report

Moonlight Water Delivery

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 11 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

11
contaminants tested
5
detected
300
people served
0
health-based violations
Alaska rankingsLead in AlaskaPFAS in Alaska
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Nome Census Area

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
92
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-05-01 → 2017-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-01 → 2017-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-01-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-04-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
1.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
1.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
0.5200 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.2 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
6 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidTTHMTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
SIMMONSSON, THOMAS
Phone
907-443-6307
Email
Thomas@NJUS.org

Frequently asked questions about Moonlight Water Delivery

Is Moonlight Water Delivery tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Moonlight Water Delivery's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Moonlight Water Delivery's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Monochloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Moonlight Water Delivery serve?

Moonlight Water Delivery reports serving 300 people in Alaska, per its EPA record.

Has Moonlight Water Delivery had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 92 violations on file for Moonlight Water Delivery, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.