← Alaska

Tap water quality report

Wasilla Creek Commons

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 41 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

41
contaminants tested
8
detected
276
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Matanuska-Susitna Borough

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
543
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-05-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-05-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-05-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2012-09-24
TT Health-based Resolved 2012-09-24
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
4340 µg/L 334%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2016–2018
Lead
33.1 µg/L 221%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
41/45 SYR4 2016–2018
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite
1590 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
700 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
12.7 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2017–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.6200 pCi/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Uranium
0.0260 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
33 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UMercuryNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LEET, CHUCK
Phone
907-775-2347
Email
badgerutilities.llc@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Wasilla Creek Commons

Is Wasilla Creek Commons tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Wasilla Creek Commons's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wasilla Creek Commons's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wasilla Creek Commons serve?

Wasilla Creek Commons reports serving 276 people in Alaska, per its EPA record.

Has Wasilla Creek Commons had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 543 violations on file for Wasilla Creek Commons, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.