Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-02-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-02-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-02-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-03-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0066 µg/L | 1/2 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 11.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 26.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 8.46 µg/L No EPA limit set | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 62.7 µg/L 78% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 22 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 16 µg/L No EPA limit set | 42/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 10 µg/L No EPA limit set | 38/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 32/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00050 mg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2024 |
| Copper | 1560 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.22 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 37 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/3 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.02 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/46 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Kickapoo Traditional Tribe
Is Kickapoo Traditional Tribe tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Kickapoo Traditional Tribe's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Kickapoo Traditional Tribe's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Kickapoo Traditional Tribe serve?
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe reports serving 9,384 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Kickapoo Traditional Tribe had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 91 violations on file for Kickapoo Traditional Tribe, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.