Tap water quality report

Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 111 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

111
contaminants tested
24
detected
5,780
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Native American

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
11
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-10-16
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0033 µg/L 1/2 2023
PFOS 0.0041 µg/L 1/2 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
406.4 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 517 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0050 mg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
17.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.9 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
15.045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
7.9575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.16 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
28.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
69.24 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.8 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.896 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.68 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.862 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.03 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
14.575 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Uranium
4.84864 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.0958 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2017–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.0675 pCi/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.12 pCi/L
4/5 SYR4 2017–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.289 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.37 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.7539 pCi/L 15%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.8200 pCi/L
3/4 SYR4 2017–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.06 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.21 pCi/L
3/4 SYR4 2017–2018
Barium
62.65 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2015
Fluoride
499 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2015
Lead
2.695 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
2/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.4205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.44 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013
Nitrate-Nitrite
288.5 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2023
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant)

Is Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant) serve?

Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant) reports serving 5,780 people, per its EPA record.

Has Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 11 violations on file for Pottawatomie Co. Rwd #3 (Dale Plant), of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.